[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20140529140337.f999bfaaf9ffabce071962ea@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 14:03:37 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Rickard Strandqvist <rickard_strandqvist@...ctrumdigital.se>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@...e.com>, Joel Becker <jlbec@...lplan.org>,
ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: ocfs2: move_extents.c: Fix to remove null pointer
checks that could never happen
On Tue, 27 May 2014 22:23:51 +0200 Rickard Strandqvist <rickard_strandqvist@...ctrumdigital.se> wrote:
> Removal of null pointer checks that could never happen
How do you know it never happens?
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/move_extents.c
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/move_extents.c
> @@ -904,9 +904,6 @@ static int ocfs2_move_extents(struct ocfs2_move_extents_context *context)
> struct buffer_head *di_bh = NULL;
> struct ocfs2_super *osb = OCFS2_SB(inode->i_sb);
>
> - if (!inode)
> - return -ENOENT;
> -
If it's due to assuming that the previous statement would have oopsed
then that is mistaken. Is is sometimes the case that gcc will move the
evaluation of inode->i_sb to after the test, so this function can be
passed NULL and it will not oops.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists