lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20140529043521.626067882@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Wed, 28 May 2014 21:37:35 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Xufeng Zhang <xufeng.zhang@...driver.com>,
	Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>,
	Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@...il.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 3.10 60/86] sctp: reset flowi4_oif parameter on route lookup

3.10-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Xufeng Zhang <xufeng.zhang@...driver.com>

[ Upstream commit 85350871317a5adb35519d9dc6fc9e80809d42ad ]

commit 813b3b5db83 (ipv4: Use caller's on-stack flowi as-is
in output route lookups.) introduces another regression which
is very similar to the problem of commit e6b45241c (ipv4: reset
flowi parameters on route connect) wants to fix:
Before we call ip_route_output_key() in sctp_v4_get_dst() to
get a dst that matches a bind address as the source address,
we have already called this function previously and the flowi
parameters have been initialized including flowi4_oif, so when
we call this function again, the process in __ip_route_output_key()
will be different because of the setting of flowi4_oif, and we'll
get a networking device which corresponds to the inputted flowi4_oif
as the output device, this is wrong because we'll never hit this
place if the previously returned source address of dst match one
of the bound addresses.

To reproduce this problem, a vlan setting is enough:
  # ifconfig eth0 up
  # route del default
  # vconfig add eth0 2
  # vconfig add eth0 3
  # ifconfig eth0.2 10.0.1.14 netmask 255.255.255.0
  # route add default gw 10.0.1.254 dev eth0.2
  # ifconfig eth0.3 10.0.0.14 netmask 255.255.255.0
  # ip rule add from 10.0.0.14 table 4
  # ip route add table 4 default via 10.0.0.254 src 10.0.0.14 dev eth0.3
  # sctp_darn -H 10.0.0.14 -P 36422 -h 10.1.4.134 -p 36422 -s -I
You'll detect that all the flow are routed to eth0.2(10.0.1.254).

Signed-off-by: Xufeng Zhang <xufeng.zhang@...driver.com>
Signed-off-by: Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>
Acked-by: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 net/sctp/protocol.c |    7 ++++++-
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/net/sctp/protocol.c
+++ b/net/sctp/protocol.c
@@ -498,8 +498,13 @@ static void sctp_v4_get_dst(struct sctp_
 			continue;
 		if ((laddr->state == SCTP_ADDR_SRC) &&
 		    (AF_INET == laddr->a.sa.sa_family)) {
-			fl4->saddr = laddr->a.v4.sin_addr.s_addr;
 			fl4->fl4_sport = laddr->a.v4.sin_port;
+			flowi4_update_output(fl4,
+					     asoc->base.sk->sk_bound_dev_if,
+					     RT_CONN_FLAGS(asoc->base.sk),
+					     daddr->v4.sin_addr.s_addr,
+					     laddr->a.v4.sin_addr.s_addr);
+
 			rt = ip_route_output_key(sock_net(sk), fl4);
 			if (!IS_ERR(rt)) {
 				dst = &rt->dst;


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ