[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20140529043105.830777770@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 21:34:27 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Cong Wang <cwang@...pensource.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.14 128/140] rtnetlink: wait for unregistering devices in rtnl_link_unregister()
3.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Cong Wang <cwang@...pensource.com>
[ Upstream commit 200b916f3575bdf11609cb447661b8d5957b0bbf ]
From: Cong Wang <cwang@...pensource.com>
commit 50624c934db18ab90 (net: Delay default_device_exit_batch until no
devices are unregistering) introduced rtnl_lock_unregistering() for
default_device_exit_batch(). Same race could happen we when rmmod a driver
which calls rtnl_link_unregister() as we call dev->destructor without rtnl
lock.
For long term, I think we should clean up the mess of netdev_run_todo()
and net namespce exit code.
Cc: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <cwang@...pensource.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
include/linux/rtnetlink.h | 5 +++++
net/core/dev.c | 2 +-
net/core/net_namespace.c | 2 +-
net/core/rtnetlink.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
4 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/include/linux/rtnetlink.h
+++ b/include/linux/rtnetlink.h
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
#include <linux/mutex.h>
#include <linux/netdevice.h>
+#include <linux/wait.h>
#include <uapi/linux/rtnetlink.h>
extern int rtnetlink_send(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net *net, u32 pid, u32 group, int echo);
@@ -22,6 +23,10 @@ extern void rtnl_lock(void);
extern void rtnl_unlock(void);
extern int rtnl_trylock(void);
extern int rtnl_is_locked(void);
+
+extern wait_queue_head_t netdev_unregistering_wq;
+extern struct mutex net_mutex;
+
#ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING
extern int lockdep_rtnl_is_held(void);
#else
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -5573,7 +5573,7 @@ static int dev_new_index(struct net *net
/* Delayed registration/unregisteration */
static LIST_HEAD(net_todo_list);
-static DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(netdev_unregistering_wq);
+DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(netdev_unregistering_wq);
static void net_set_todo(struct net_device *dev)
{
--- a/net/core/net_namespace.c
+++ b/net/core/net_namespace.c
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@
static LIST_HEAD(pernet_list);
static struct list_head *first_device = &pernet_list;
-static DEFINE_MUTEX(net_mutex);
+DEFINE_MUTEX(net_mutex);
LIST_HEAD(net_namespace_list);
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(net_namespace_list);
--- a/net/core/rtnetlink.c
+++ b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
@@ -353,15 +353,46 @@ void __rtnl_link_unregister(struct rtnl_
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__rtnl_link_unregister);
+/* Return with the rtnl_lock held when there are no network
+ * devices unregistering in any network namespace.
+ */
+static void rtnl_lock_unregistering_all(void)
+{
+ struct net *net;
+ bool unregistering;
+ DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
+
+ for (;;) {
+ prepare_to_wait(&netdev_unregistering_wq, &wait,
+ TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
+ unregistering = false;
+ rtnl_lock();
+ for_each_net(net) {
+ if (net->dev_unreg_count > 0) {
+ unregistering = true;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ if (!unregistering)
+ break;
+ __rtnl_unlock();
+ schedule();
+ }
+ finish_wait(&netdev_unregistering_wq, &wait);
+}
+
/**
* rtnl_link_unregister - Unregister rtnl_link_ops from rtnetlink.
* @ops: struct rtnl_link_ops * to unregister
*/
void rtnl_link_unregister(struct rtnl_link_ops *ops)
{
- rtnl_lock();
+ /* Close the race with cleanup_net() */
+ mutex_lock(&net_mutex);
+ rtnl_lock_unregistering_all();
__rtnl_link_unregister(ops);
rtnl_unlock();
+ mutex_unlock(&net_mutex);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rtnl_link_unregister);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists