linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.14 032/140] tracing: Use rcu_dereference

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 28 May 2014 21:32:51 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...ux.intel.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3.14 032/140] tracing: Use rcu_dereference_sched() for trace event triggers

3.14-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)" <rostedt@...dmis.org>

commit 561a4fe851ccab9dd0d14989ab566f9392d9f8b5 upstream.

As trace event triggers are now part of the mainline kernel, I added
my trace event trigger tests to my test suite I run on all my kernels.
Now these tests get run under different config options, and one of
those options is CONFIG_PROVE_RCU, which checks under lockdep that
the rcu locking primitives are being used correctly. This triggered
the following splat:

===============================
[ INFO: suspicious RCU usage. ]
3.15.0-rc2-test+ #11 Not tainted
-------------------------------
kernel/trace/trace_events_trigger.c:80 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!

other info that might help us debug this:

rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 0
4 locks held by swapper/1/0:
 #0:  ((&(&j_cdbs->work)->timer)){..-...}, at: [<ffffffff8104d2cc>] call_timer_fn+0x5/0x1be
 #1:  (&(&pool->lock)->rlock){-.-...}, at: [<ffffffff81059856>] __queue_work+0x140/0x283
 #2:  (&p->pi_lock){-.-.-.}, at: [<ffffffff8106e961>] try_to_wake_up+0x2e/0x1e8
 #3:  (&rq->lock){-.-.-.}, at: [<ffffffff8106ead3>] try_to_wake_up+0x1a0/0x1e8

stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/1 Not tainted 3.15.0-rc2-test+ #11
Hardware name:                  /DG965MQ, BIOS MQ96510J.86A.0372.2006.0605.1717 06/05/2006
 0000000000000001 ffff88007e083b98 ffffffff819f53a5 0000000000000006
 ffff88007b0942c0 ffff88007e083bc8 ffffffff81081307 ffff88007ad96d20
 0000000000000000 ffff88007af2d840 ffff88007b2e701c ffff88007e083c18
Call Trace:
 <IRQ>  [<ffffffff819f53a5>] dump_stack+0x4f/0x7c
 [<ffffffff81081307>] lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0x107/0x110
 [<ffffffff810ee51c>] event_triggers_call+0x99/0x108
 [<ffffffff810e8174>] ftrace_event_buffer_commit+0x42/0xa4
 [<ffffffff8106aadc>] ftrace_raw_event_sched_wakeup_template+0x71/0x7c
 [<ffffffff8106bcbf>] ttwu_do_wakeup+0x7f/0xff
 [<ffffffff8106bd9b>] ttwu_do_activate.constprop.126+0x5c/0x61
 [<ffffffff8106eadf>] try_to_wake_up+0x1ac/0x1e8
 [<ffffffff8106eb77>] wake_up_process+0x36/0x3b
 [<ffffffff810575cc>] wake_up_worker+0x24/0x26
 [<ffffffff810578bc>] insert_work+0x5c/0x65
 [<ffffffff81059982>] __queue_work+0x26c/0x283
 [<ffffffff81059999>] ? __queue_work+0x283/0x283
 [<ffffffff810599b7>] delayed_work_timer_fn+0x1e/0x20
 [<ffffffff8104d3a6>] call_timer_fn+0xdf/0x1be^M
 [<ffffffff8104d2cc>] ? call_timer_fn+0x5/0x1be
 [<ffffffff81059999>] ? __queue_work+0x283/0x283
 [<ffffffff8104d823>] run_timer_softirq+0x1a4/0x22f^M
 [<ffffffff8104696d>] __do_softirq+0x17b/0x31b^M
 [<ffffffff81046d03>] irq_exit+0x42/0x97
 [<ffffffff81a08db6>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x37/0x44
 [<ffffffff81a07a2f>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x6f/0x80
 <EOI>  [<ffffffff8100a5d8>] ? default_idle+0x21/0x32
 [<ffffffff8100a5d6>] ? default_idle+0x1f/0x32
 [<ffffffff8100ac10>] arch_cpu_idle+0xf/0x11
 [<ffffffff8107b3a4>] cpu_startup_entry+0x1a3/0x213
 [<ffffffff8102a23c>] start_secondary+0x212/0x219

The cause is that the triggers are protected by rcu_read_lock_sched() but
the data is dereferenced with rcu_dereference() which expects it to
be protected with rcu_read_lock(). The proper reference should be
rcu_dereference_sched().

Cc: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...ux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 kernel/trace/trace_events_trigger.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/kernel/trace/trace_events_trigger.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events_trigger.c
@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ event_triggers_call(struct ftrace_event_
 			data->ops->func(data);
 			continue;
 		}
-		filter = rcu_dereference(data->filter);
+		filter = rcu_dereference_sched(data->filter);
 		if (filter && !filter_match_preds(filter, rec))
 			continue;
 		if (data->cmd_ops->post_trigger) {


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/