lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <5386E313.6070705@samsung.com>
Date:	Thu, 29 May 2014 09:34:43 +0200
From:	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
To:	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
Cc:	Laura Abbott <lauraa@...eaurora.org>,
	Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] CMA: correct unlock target

Hello,

On 2014-05-29 08:29, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> 'cma: Remove potential deadlock situation' introduces per cma area mutex
> for bitmap management. It is good, but there is one mistake. When we
> can't find appropriate area in bitmap, we release cma_mutex global lock
> rather than cma->lock and this is a bug. So fix it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>

Thanks for spotting this issue. I've added it to my tree.

> diff --git a/drivers/base/dma-contiguous.c b/drivers/base/dma-contiguous.c
> index 6f6bffc..83969f8 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/dma-contiguous.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/dma-contiguous.c
> @@ -331,7 +331,7 @@ struct page *dma_alloc_from_contiguous(struct device *dev, int count,
>   		pageno = bitmap_find_next_zero_area(cma->bitmap, cma->count,
>   						    start, count, mask);
>   		if (pageno >= cma->count) {
> -			mutex_unlock(&cma_mutex);
> +			mutex_unlock(&cma->lock);
>   			break;
>   		}
>   		bitmap_set(cma->bitmap, pageno, count);

Best regards
-- 
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ