lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140529074909.GI6677@dastard>
Date:	Thu, 29 May 2014 17:49:09 +1000
From:	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
To:	Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	xfs@....sgi.com, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: xfs: possible deadlock warning

On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 11:34:21AM +0800, Gu Zheng wrote:
> Hi Dave,
> 
> On 05/28/2014 02:00 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 01:19:16PM +0800, Gu Zheng wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >> When running the latest Linus' tree, the following possible deadlock warning occurs.
> > 
> > false positive. There isn't a deadlock between inode locks on
> > different filesystems. i.e. there is no dependency between shmem
> > inodes and xfs inodes, nor on their security contexts.  Nor can you
> > take a page fault on a directory inode, which is the XFS inode lock
> > class it's complaining about.
> 
> If it's really a noisy, can we avoid this?

It's on my list of things to do. The XFs directory locking was
changed slightly to remove race condition that SGI's CXFS filesystem
was hitting, and that introduced all these lockdep false positives.

Unfortunately, to get rid of the lockdep false positives we can
either:

	a) revert the locking change; or
	b) rewrite the readdir code to use more fine grained locking
	   so that we don't hold the lock over filldir() calls.

I don't think that reverting a change that fixed a directory
corruption problem is a good idea, so rewriting the readdir code is
the solution.

SGI have disappeared off the planet so they aren't going to fix it
anytime soon, so it's waiting for me to find the time to finish and
test the patches I have ibeen working on in my spare time that
rework the readdir code.

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@...morbit.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ