linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] Marvell Berlin full clock support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5386FBC3.1000003@gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 29 May 2014 11:20:03 +0200
From:	Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>
To:	Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>
CC:	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
	Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...vell.com>,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] Marvell Berlin full clock support

On 05/29/2014 02:07 AM, Mike Turquette wrote:
> Quoting Sebastian Hesselbarth (2014-05-19 09:43:21)
>> Mike,
>>
>> this is v2 of the Berlin SoC clock driver [1] but with a reworked DT
>> binding as requested [2]. We decided to not even try to split up the chip
>> control registers that deal with pinmux, padmux, clock, reset, and evil
>> stuff we haven't even looked at. Instead we keep a single node that clock
>> driver will remap early, while proper platform_drivers use a regmap
>> instead. Although clock and other drivers share the same register range,
>> they use individual registers exclusively.
>>
>> There are some functional fixes in the single clock drivers, I noticed
>> while retesting each individial driver. There will be more to fixup but
>> without any drivers actually using the clocks, it is hard to tell what
>> isn't working now.
>>
>> Anyway, the current binding should match what you requested and having
>> a clock driver for v3.16 will really be a huge benefit for us to work
>> on more driver support.
>>
>> If you are fine with it, please take patches 2-7 and I'll pick up
>> 1,8-10 in berlin branch.
> 
> Patches #2-7 applied to clk-next.

Thanks Mike, but please drop patch #2
  ("clk: berlin: add binding include for Berlin SoC clock ids")
before you push your clk-next branch, it already went through arm-soc.

Sorry,
  Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/