[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87iooo7skp.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 20:35:58 +0930
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] virtio_ring: unify direct/indirect code paths.
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> writes:
> On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 04:56:45PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
>> Before:
>> gcc 4.8.2: virtio_blk: stack used = 392
>> gcc 4.6.4: virtio_blk: stack used = 480
>>
>> After:
>> gcc 4.8.2: virtio_blk: stack used = 408
>> gcc 4.6.4: virtio_blk: stack used = 432
>
> Is it worth it to make the good compiler worse? People are going to use
> the newer GCC more as time goes on anyhow.
No, but it's only 16 bytes of stack loss for a simplicity win:
virtio_ring.c | 120 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------------------
1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 75 deletions(-)
Cheers,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists