| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20140529112905.GD30210@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 14:29:05 +0300
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] virtio_ring: unify direct/indirect code paths.
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 04:56:45PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
> virtqueue_add() populates the virtqueue descriptor table from the sgs
> given. If it uses an indirect descriptor table, then it puts a single
> descriptor in the descriptor table pointing to the kmalloc'ed indirect
> table where the sg is populated.
>
> Previously vring_add_indirect() did the allocation and the simple
> linear layout. We replace that with alloc_indirect() which allocates
> the indirect table then chains it like the normal descriptor table so
> we can reuse the core logic.
>
> Before:
> gcc 4.8.2: virtio_blk: stack used = 392
> gcc 4.6.4: virtio_blk: stack used = 480
>
> After:
> gcc 4.8.2: virtio_blk: stack used = 408
> gcc 4.6.4: virtio_blk: stack used = 432
>
> Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
> ---
> drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 120 ++++++++++++++++---------------------------
> 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 75 deletions(-)
It's nice that we have less code now but it's data path -
are you sure it's worth the performance cost?
>
> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> index 5d29cd85d6cf..3adf5978b92b 100644
> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> @@ -107,18 +107,10 @@ struct vring_virtqueue
>
> #define to_vvq(_vq) container_of(_vq, struct vring_virtqueue, vq)
>
> -/* Set up an indirect table of descriptors and add it to the queue. */
> -static inline int vring_add_indirect(struct vring_virtqueue *vq,
> - struct scatterlist *sgs[],
> - unsigned int total_sg,
> - unsigned int out_sgs,
> - unsigned int in_sgs,
> - gfp_t gfp)
> +static struct vring_desc *alloc_indirect(unsigned int total_sg, gfp_t gfp)
> {
> - struct vring_desc *desc;
> - unsigned head;
> - struct scatterlist *sg;
> - int i, n;
> + struct vring_desc *desc;
> + unsigned int i;
>
> /*
> * We require lowmem mappings for the descriptors because
> @@ -130,51 +122,13 @@ static inline int vring_add_indirect(struct vring_virtqueue *vq,
> if (record_stack == current)
> __asm__ __volatile__("movq %%rsp,%0" : "=g" (stack_top));
>
> - desc = kmalloc(total_sg * sizeof(struct vring_desc), gfp);
> - if (!desc)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> -
> - /* Transfer entries from the sg lists into the indirect page */
> - i = 0;
> - for (n = 0; n < out_sgs; n++) {
> - for (sg = sgs[n]; sg; sg = sg_next(sg)) {
> - desc[i].flags = VRING_DESC_F_NEXT;
> - desc[i].addr = sg_phys(sg);
> - desc[i].len = sg->length;
> - desc[i].next = i+1;
> - i++;
> - }
> - }
> - for (; n < (out_sgs + in_sgs); n++) {
> - for (sg = sgs[n]; sg; sg = sg_next(sg)) {
> - desc[i].flags = VRING_DESC_F_NEXT|VRING_DESC_F_WRITE;
> - desc[i].addr = sg_phys(sg);
> - desc[i].len = sg->length;
> - desc[i].next = i+1;
> - i++;
> - }
> - }
> - BUG_ON(i != total_sg);
> -
> - /* Last one doesn't continue. */
> - desc[i-1].flags &= ~VRING_DESC_F_NEXT;
> - desc[i-1].next = 0;
> -
> - /* We're about to use a buffer */
> - vq->vq.num_free--;
> -
> - /* Use a single buffer which doesn't continue */
> - head = vq->free_head;
> - vq->vring.desc[head].flags = VRING_DESC_F_INDIRECT;
> - vq->vring.desc[head].addr = virt_to_phys(desc);
> - /* kmemleak gives a false positive, as it's hidden by virt_to_phys */
> - kmemleak_ignore(desc);
> - vq->vring.desc[head].len = i * sizeof(struct vring_desc);
> -
> - /* Update free pointer */
> - vq->free_head = vq->vring.desc[head].next;
> + desc = kmalloc(total_sg * sizeof(struct vring_desc), gfp);
> + if (!desc)
> + return NULL;
>
> - return head;
> + for (i = 0; i < total_sg; i++)
> + desc[i].next = i+1;
> + return desc;
Hmm we are doing an extra walk over descriptors here.
This might hurt performance esp for big descriptors.
> }
>
> static inline int virtqueue_add(struct virtqueue *_vq,
> @@ -187,6 +141,7 @@ static inline int virtqueue_add(struct virtqueue *_vq,
> {
> struct vring_virtqueue *vq = to_vvq(_vq);
> struct scatterlist *sg;
> + struct vring_desc *desc = NULL;
> unsigned int i, n, avail, uninitialized_var(prev);
> int head;
>
> @@ -212,18 +167,32 @@ static inline int virtqueue_add(struct virtqueue *_vq,
> }
> #endif
>
> + BUG_ON(total_sg > vq->vring.num);
> + BUG_ON(total_sg == 0);
> +
> + head = vq->free_head;
> +
> /* If the host supports indirect descriptor tables, and we have multiple
> * buffers, then go indirect. FIXME: tune this threshold */
> - if (vq->indirect && total_sg > 1 && vq->vq.num_free) {
> - head = vring_add_indirect(vq, sgs, total_sg,
> - out_sgs, in_sgs, gfp);
> - if (likely(head >= 0))
> - goto add_head;
> + if (vq->indirect && total_sg > 1 && vq->vq.num_free)
> + desc = alloc_indirect(total_sg, gfp);
else desc = NULL will be a bit clearer won't it?
> +
> + if (desc) {
> + /* Use a single buffer which doesn't continue */
> + vq->vring.desc[head].flags = VRING_DESC_F_INDIRECT;
> + vq->vring.desc[head].addr = virt_to_phys(desc);
> + /* avoid kmemleak false positive (tis hidden by virt_to_phys) */
> + kmemleak_ignore(desc);
> + vq->vring.desc[head].len = total_sg * sizeof(struct vring_desc);
> +
> + /* Set up rest to use this indirect table. */
> + i = 0;
> + total_sg = 1;
> + } else {
> + desc = vq->vring.desc;
> + i = head;
> }
>
> - BUG_ON(total_sg > vq->vring.num);
> - BUG_ON(total_sg == 0);
> -
> if (vq->vq.num_free < total_sg) {
> pr_debug("Can't add buf len %i - avail = %i\n",
> total_sg, vq->vq.num_free);
> @@ -239,32 +208,33 @@ static inline int virtqueue_add(struct virtqueue *_vq,
> /* We're about to use some buffers from the free list. */
> vq->vq.num_free -= total_sg;
>
> - head = i = vq->free_head;
> for (n = 0; n < out_sgs; n++) {
> for (sg = sgs[n]; sg; sg = sg_next(sg)) {
> - vq->vring.desc[i].flags = VRING_DESC_F_NEXT;
> - vq->vring.desc[i].addr = sg_phys(sg);
> - vq->vring.desc[i].len = sg->length;
> + desc[i].flags = VRING_DESC_F_NEXT;
> + desc[i].addr = sg_phys(sg);
> + desc[i].len = sg->length;
> prev = i;
> - i = vq->vring.desc[i].next;
> + i = desc[i].next;
> }
> }
> for (; n < (out_sgs + in_sgs); n++) {
> for (sg = sgs[n]; sg; sg = sg_next(sg)) {
> - vq->vring.desc[i].flags = VRING_DESC_F_NEXT|VRING_DESC_F_WRITE;
> - vq->vring.desc[i].addr = sg_phys(sg);
> - vq->vring.desc[i].len = sg->length;
> + desc[i].flags = VRING_DESC_F_NEXT|VRING_DESC_F_WRITE;
> + desc[i].addr = sg_phys(sg);
> + desc[i].len = sg->length;
> prev = i;
> - i = vq->vring.desc[i].next;
> + i = desc[i].next;
> }
> }
> /* Last one doesn't continue. */
> - vq->vring.desc[prev].flags &= ~VRING_DESC_F_NEXT;
> + desc[prev].flags &= ~VRING_DESC_F_NEXT;
>
> /* Update free pointer */
> - vq->free_head = i;
> + if (desc == vq->vring.desc)
> + vq->free_head = i;
> + else
> + vq->free_head = vq->vring.desc[head].next;
This one is slightly ugly isn't it?
>
> -add_head:
> /* Set token. */
> vq->data[head] = data;
>
> --
> 1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists