[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5387385B.1030203@zytor.com>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 06:38:35 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC: josh@...htriplett.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/char/mem.c: Add /dev/ioports, supporting 16-bit
and 32-bit ports
On 05/29/2014 02:26 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 28 May 2014 14:41:52 H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> On 05/19/2014 05:36 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>>
>>> My feeling is that all devices we can think of fall into at least one
>>> of these categories:
>>>
>>> * legacy PC stuff that needs only byte access
>>> * PCI devices that can be accessed through sysfs
>>> * devices on x86 that can be accessed using iopl
>>>
>>
>> I don't believe PCI I/O space devices can be accessed through sysfs, but
>> perhaps I'm wrong? (mmapping I/O space is not portable.)
>
> The interface is there, both a read/write and mmap on the resource
> bin_attribute. But it seems you're right, neither of them is implemented
> on all architectures.
>
> Only powerpc, microblaze, alpha, sparc and xtensa allow users to mmap
> I/O space, even though a lot of others could. The read-write interface
> is only defined for alpha, ia64, microblaze and powerpc.
>
And how is that read/write interface defined? Does it have the same
silly handling of data sizes?
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists