[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140529035233.GF18016@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 04:52:33 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...e.cz>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: fs/dcache.c - BUG: soft lockup - CPU#5 stuck for 22s!
[systemd-udevd:1667]
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 04:11:49AM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 07:39:54PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
>
> > OK, the warnings about averting your eyes very much apply; the thing below
> > definitely needs more massage before it becomes acceptable (and no, it's
> > not a single commit; I'm not that insane), but it changes behaviour in the
> > way described above. Could you check if the livelock persists with it?
> > No trace-generating code in there, so the logs should be compact enough...
>
> Here's an updated patch, hopefully slightly less vomit-inducing. Should
> give the same behaviour as the previous one... Again, it's a cumulative
> diff - I'm still massaging the splitup here.
BTW, it still leaves the "proceed to parent" case in shrink_dentry_list();
in theory, it's also vulnerable to the same livelock. Can be dealt pretty
much the same way; I'd rather leave that one for right after -final, though,
if the already posted variant turns out to be sufficient...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists