[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140529140427.GI11074@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 16:04:27 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux@....linux.org.uk, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, Morten.Rasmussen@....com, efault@....de,
nicolas.pitre@...aro.org, linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org,
daniel.lezcano@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/11] sched: move cfs task on a CPU with higher
capacity
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 05:53:04PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> @@ -7282,6 +7289,12 @@ static inline int nohz_kick_needed(struct rq *rq)
>
> if (nr_busy > 1)
> goto need_kick_unlock;
> +
> + if ((rq->cfs.h_nr_running >= 1)
> + && ((rq->cpu_power * sd->imbalance_pct) <
> + (rq->cpu_power_orig * 100)))
> + goto need_kick_unlock;
> +
> }
>
> sd = rcu_dereference(per_cpu(sd_asym, cpu));
So what happens when a cpu is consistently low on power (say due to a
pinned RT task) the balancer would quickly adjust the load level, but
this would endlessly kick things into action, even though we're balanced
just fine.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists