[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140529150705.GJ19143@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 17:07:05 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, acme@...stprotocols.net,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: perf: use after free in perf_remove_from_context
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 10:47:09AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> It doesn't work out well because we later lock a mutex in sync_child_event().
>
Urgh, right you are. I'll go stare at it more. It shouldn't have
mattered, because the mutex we take just before should ensure existence,
but.. you know.. :-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists