[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140529163037.GC2552@obsidianresearch.com>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 10:30:37 -0600
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>
To: Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Liviu Dudau <liviu@...au.co.uk>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, tony@...mide.com,
Mohit Kumar <mohit.kumar@...com>,
Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/18] PCI: designware: Configuration space should be
specified in 'reg'
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 11:03:36AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> Just because the kernel doesn’t handle this is NO reason to change
> the way the DT works.
The OF specs do not specify how to process a config type ranges entry,
and we all mutually agreed that the only sane interpretation for such
a thing would be to describe an ECAM memory space so generic code
could potentially make use of it.
Since designware is not ECAM it should not use config ranges.
This has come up multiple times now, and the above is the consensus.
Jason
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists