linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3.14 000/140] 3.14.5-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140529182109.GA10142@kroah.com>
Date:	Thu, 29 May 2014 11:21:09 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, satoru.takeuchi@...il.com,
	shuah.kh@...sung.com, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.14 000/140] 3.14.5-stable review

On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 08:06:10AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 05/28/2014 09:32 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.14.5 release.
> >There are 140 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> >to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> >let me know.
> >
> >Responses should be made by Sat May 31 04:30:12 UTC 2014.
> >Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> 
> Build results:
>     total: 143 pass: 133 skipped: 4 fail: 6
> 
> Qemu tests all passed.
> 
> Failing builds are
> 
> alpha:defconfig			- Fails with 'Inconsistent kallsyms data'. New failure; need to debug.
> unicore32:defconfig		- still fails to build for all releases
> powerpc:allmodconfig	 	- fail for binutils 2.3 and 2.4. known problem; patch pending
> powerpc:ppc64e_defconfig	- fail if built with binutils 2.4; patch pending
> powerpc:chroma_defconfig	- fail if built with binutils 2.4; patch pending
> 
> Bisect points to commit 'vlan: Fix lockdep warning with stacked vlan devices' as culprit
> for the alpha:defconfig build failure. Reverting this patch fixes the problem.
> I looked at the patch, but I have no idea what may cause the failure.

Odd.  Is this also broken in Linus's tree?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/