[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKDJKT4sXfwZnkcGzuQVGULbJnUEZjD7do0fn98Go2RnJso-Cw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 23:57:01 +0530
From: Manish Badarkhe <badarkhe.manish@...il.com>
To: "linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@...il.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
मनिष बदरखे
<badarkhe.manish@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4] max8925_power: Use "IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF)" for DT code.
Hi Dmitry,
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 10:15 PM, Manish Badarkhe
<badarkhe.manish@...il.com> wrote:
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 10:24 PM, Manish Badarkhe
> <badarkhe.manish@...il.com> wrote:
>> Instead of "#ifdef CONFIG_OF" use "IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF)"
>> option for DT code to avoid if-deffery in code.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Manish Badarkhe <badarkhe.manish@...il.com>
>> ---
>> Changes since V1:
>> 1.Updated code to use "IS_ENABLED" during retrieval
>> of platform/DT data.
>>
>> Changes since V2:
>> 1.Updated code as per Dmitry's comment to give preferance to
>> platform data.
>>
>> Changes since V3:
>> 1.Updated code to use "IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF)" to remove
>> DT data retrieval function during compilation itself
>> when CONFIG_OF option is not set.
>>
>> :100644 100644 b4513f2... a7482db... M drivers/power/max8925_power.c
>> drivers/power/max8925_power.c | 17 +++++------------
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/power/max8925_power.c b/drivers/power/max8925_power.c
>> index b4513f2..a7482db 100644
>> --- a/drivers/power/max8925_power.c
>> +++ b/drivers/power/max8925_power.c
>> @@ -427,7 +427,6 @@ static int max8925_deinit_charger(struct max8925_power_info *info)
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_OF
>> static struct max8925_power_pdata *
>> max8925_power_dt_init(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> {
>> @@ -440,9 +439,6 @@ max8925_power_dt_init(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> int no_insert_detect;
>> struct max8925_power_pdata *pdata;
>>
>> - if (!nproot)
>> - return pdev->dev.platform_data;
>> -
>> np = of_find_node_by_name(nproot, "charger");
>> if (!np) {
>> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to find charger node\n");
>> @@ -468,13 +464,6 @@ max8925_power_dt_init(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>
>> return pdata;
>> }
>> -#else
>> -static struct max8925_power_pdata *
>> -max8925_power_dt_init(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> -{
>> - return pdev->dev.platform_data;
>> -}
>> -#endif
>>
>> static int max8925_power_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> {
>> @@ -483,7 +472,11 @@ static int max8925_power_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> struct max8925_power_info *info;
>> int ret;
>>
>> - pdata = max8925_power_dt_init(pdev);
>> + pdata = dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
>> +
>> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF) && !pdata && chip->dev->of_node)
>> + pdata = max8925_power_dt_init(pdev);
>> +
>> if (!pdata) {
>> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "platform data isn't assigned to "
>> "power supply\n");
>
> Gentle ping!!
> Please let me know, are there any review comments on this patch?
Gentle ping!!
Thanks
Manish Badarkhe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists