[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <538784C1.6000504@wwwdotorg.org>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 13:04:33 -0600
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>
CC: Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/5] misc: fuse: Add efuse driver for Tegra
On 05/28/2014 06:54 AM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> Implement fuse driver for Tegra20, Tegra30, Tegra114 and Tegra124.
> diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-tegra-fuse b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-tegra-fuse
> +Description: read-only access to the efuses on Tegra20, Tegra30, Tegra114
> + and Tegra124 SoC's from NVIDIA. The efuses contain write once
> + data programmed at the factory. The data is layed out in 32bit
> + words in LSB first formnat. The number of valid bits depends
s/formnat/format/
> + on the word and the SoC. The mapping is as follows:
> +
> + For Tegra20:
> + Word 0 - 1 : bit 0
> + Word 2 : unused
> + Word 3 : bits 0 - 31
> + Word 4 : bits 0 - 7
Do we really need these long tables that indicate which bits are used?
As I mentioned before, when I asked for documentation of the format of
these files, all I wanted was a brief not indicating that the data was
binary, and that each bit potentially represents a fuse... Either we
should leave it at that, or actually document what each bit represents,
which would hopefully be a pointless duplication of the TRM.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists