[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <5388200F.7000201@samsung.com>
Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 08:07:11 +0200
From: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
To: Laura Abbott <lauraa@...eaurora.org>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
Cc: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] CMA: correct unlock target
Hello,
On 2014-05-29 16:56, Laura Abbott wrote:
> On 5/29/2014 12:34 AM, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On 2014-05-29 08:29, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> >> 'cma: Remove potential deadlock situation' introduces per cma area mutex
> >> for bitmap management. It is good, but there is one mistake. When we
> >> can't find appropriate area in bitmap, we release cma_mutex global lock
> >> rather than cma->lock and this is a bug. So fix it.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
> >
> > Thanks for spotting this issue. I've added it to my tree.
> >
> >> diff --git a/drivers/base/dma-contiguous.c b/drivers/base/dma-contiguous.c
> >> index 6f6bffc..83969f8 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/base/dma-contiguous.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/base/dma-contiguous.c
> >> @@ -331,7 +331,7 @@ struct page *dma_alloc_from_contiguous(struct device *dev, int count,
> >> pageno = bitmap_find_next_zero_area(cma->bitmap, cma->count,
> >> start, count, mask);
> >> if (pageno >= cma->count) {
> >> - mutex_unlock(&cma_mutex);
> >> + mutex_unlock(&cma->lock);
> >> break;
> >> }
> >> bitmap_set(cma->bitmap, pageno, count);
> >
> > Best regards
>
> Acked-by: Laura Abbott <lauraa@...eaurora.org>
>
> Who actually ended up picking up that patch? I sent it out but didn't realize it had been
> picked up.
I've taken it to my dma-mapping tree some time ago, I think that
I've replied to the original mail with information about taking it.
Best regards
--
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists