[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140530073153.GA20167@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 09:31:53 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: gleb@...nel.org, pbonzini@...hat.com, eranian@...gle.com,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] perf: Allow guest PEBS for KVM owned counters
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 06:12:05PM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
>
> Currently perf unconditionally disables PEBS for guest.
>
> Now that we have the infrastructure in place to handle
> it we can allow it for KVM owned guest events. For
> the perf needs to know that a event is owned by
> a guest. Add a new state bit in the perf_event for that.
>
This doesn't make sense; why does it need to be owned?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists