[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140530081043.GO5961@tbergstrom-lnx.Nvidia.com>
Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 11:10:43 +0300
From: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>
To: Saravana Kannan <skannan@...eaurora.org>
CC: Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] clk: flatten clk tree in debugfs
> >>
> >> Mike, others,
> >>
> >> Any objections to this idea? If there's not much opposition, then maybe
> >> Peter can actually spend time fixing and testing this patch?
> >
> > Idea seems fine. I had actually considered removing the hiearchal
> > directory structure completely with the advent of clk_dump and
> > clk_summary, but if there is value in the flattened directory structure
> > then I'm all for it.
> I think the additional value of the flattened directory probably comes
> from internal tree patches that would add set rate capability to clocks,
> etc that would be helpful with testing.
>
Yes. Eg. I posted a patch to dump a clocks registers for Tegra.
> Agree with all the comments so far.
>
> Peter,
>
> Looks like there's some support and no opposition so far. So do you want
> to send out a real patch that's been tested and with the comments above
> taken care of?
Yes. I will do that.
Cheers,
Peter.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists