linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] block/bio.c: update bi_iter.bi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140530094247.GB5207@gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 30 May 2014 11:42:47 +0200
From:	Dongsu Park <dongsu.park@...fitbricks.com>
To:	Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>
Cc:	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Maurizio Lombardi <mlombard@...hat.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
	Kent Overstreet <kmo@...erainc.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block/bio.c: update bi_iter.bi_size before recounting
 segments

Hi Ming,

On 29.05.2014 15:59, Ming Lei wrote:
> The patch of "bio: modify __bio_add_page() to accept pages that
> don't start a new segment" changes the way for adding one page
> to bio:
> 
> 	- previously by adding page after checking successfully
> 	- now by trying to add page and recover if it fails
> 
> Unfortunately the patch forgets to update bio->bi_iter.bi_size
> before trying to add page, then the last vector for holding
> the added page may not be covered if recouning segments is needed,
> so bio->bi_phys_segments may become not consistent with the
> actual bio page buffers after the page is added successfully
> to the bio(after bi_iter.bi_size is added by 'len')
> 
> Suppose the page in the last vector can't be merged to bio, tragedy
> will happen when __bio_add_page() is called to add another page:
> 
> 	- blk_recount_segments() is called and the actual segments get
> 	figured out correctly
> 
> 	- the actual segments may become queue_max_segments(q) plus one
> 	in failure path
> 
> 	- driver will find the segment count is too big to handle.
> 
> The patch fixes the virtio-blk oops bug reported from Jet Chen in
> below link:
> 
> 	http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=140113053817095&w=2

A great patch description, thanks! :-)
You can add:

Tested-by: Dongsu Park <dongsu.park@...fitbricks.com>

> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
> Cc: Maurizio Lombardi <mlombard@...hat.com>
> Cc: Dongsu Park <dongsu.park@...fitbricks.com>
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
> Cc: Kent Overstreet <kmo@...erainc.com>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> Reported-by: Jet Chen <jet.chen@...el.com>
> Tested-by: Jet Chen <jet.chen@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>
> ---
> Andrew, could you put the patch in your -mm tree
> because the previous two patches were routed from
> your tree?
> 
>  block/bio.c |    4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block/bio.c b/block/bio.c
> index 0443694..f9bae56 100644
> --- a/block/bio.c
> +++ b/block/bio.c
> @@ -744,6 +744,7 @@ static int __bio_add_page(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio, struct page
>  				}
>  			}
>  
> +			bio->bi_iter.bi_size += len;
>  			goto done;
>  		}
>  	}
> @@ -761,6 +762,7 @@ static int __bio_add_page(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio, struct page
>  	bvec->bv_offset = offset;
>  	bio->bi_vcnt++;
>  	bio->bi_phys_segments++;
> +	bio->bi_iter.bi_size += len;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Perform a recount if the number of segments is greater
> @@ -802,7 +804,6 @@ static int __bio_add_page(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio, struct page
>  		bio->bi_flags &= ~(1 << BIO_SEG_VALID);
>  
>   done:
> -	bio->bi_iter.bi_size += len;
>  	return len;
>  
>   failed:
> @@ -810,6 +811,7 @@ static int __bio_add_page(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio, struct page
>  	bvec->bv_len = 0;
>  	bvec->bv_offset = 0;
>  	bio->bi_vcnt--;
> +	bio->bi_iter.bi_size -= len;
>  	blk_recount_segments(q, bio);
>  	return 0;
>  }
> -- 
> 1.7.9.5
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/