lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2049073.iShziF2J0h@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date:	Fri, 30 May 2014 14:22:55 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To:	Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@...aro.org>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc:	Lists linaro-kernel <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
	"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, arvind.chauhan@....com,
	inderpal.s@...sung.com, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
	Chander Kashyap <chander.kashyap@...aro.org>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, len.brown@...el.com,
	sudeep.holla@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 2/8] opp: call of_node_{get|put}() from of_init_opp_table()

On Friday, May 30, 2014 12:03:08 PM Sachin Kamat wrote:
> Hi Viresh,
> 
> On 27 May 2014 17:20, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> wrote:
> > All callers of of_init_opp_table() are required to take reference of
> > dev->of_node, by initiating calls to of_node_{get|put}(), before and after
> > calling of_init_opp_table().
> >
> > Its better to call these from within of_init_opp_table(), no fun adding
> > redundant code to every caller.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/base/power/opp.c | 4 ++++
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/base/power/opp.c b/drivers/base/power/opp.c
> > index faae9cf..2b615b9 100644
> > --- a/drivers/base/power/opp.c
> > +++ b/drivers/base/power/opp.c
> > @@ -622,6 +622,9 @@ int of_init_opp_table(struct device *dev)
> >         const __be32 *val;
> >         int nr;
> >
> > +       if (!of_node_get(dev->of_node))
> > +               return -ENODEV;
> > +
> >         prop = of_find_property(dev->of_node, "operating-points", NULL);
> >         if (!prop)
> >                 return -ENODEV;
> 
> What about of_node_put before returning here and other places in this function?

Yeah, that needs to be fixed.

The rest of the series looks good to me, so Viresh, please fix this one ASAP and
send an update (of this particular patch only).

Thanks!

-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ