[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140530153943.GC24871@htj.dyndns.org>
Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 11:39:43 -0400
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@...more.it>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>,
Fabio Checconi <fchecconi@...il.com>,
Arianna Avanzini <avanzini.arianna@...il.com>,
Paolo Valente <posta_paolo@...oo.it>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC - TAKE TWO - 02/12] block, bfq: add full hierarchical
scheduling and cgroups support
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 11:37:18AM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 11:05:33AM +0200, Paolo Valente wrote:
> > diff --git a/include/linux/cgroup_subsys.h b/include/linux/cgroup_subsys.h
> > index 768fe44..cdd2528 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/cgroup_subsys.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/cgroup_subsys.h
> > @@ -39,6 +39,10 @@ SUBSYS(net_cls)
> > SUBSYS(blkio)
> > #endif
> >
> > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CGROUP_BFQIO)
> > +SUBSYS(bfqio)
> > +#endif
>
> So, ummm, I don't think this is a good idea. Why aren't you plugging
> into the blkcg infrastructure as cfq does? Why does it need to be a
> separate controller?
If there's something which doesn't work for bfq in blkcg, please let
me know. I'd be happy to make it work.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists