[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFxni7MFPqdNh7LFssAaLLPP0nuvx-6OSdAU3vEqEdmWPw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 18:30:26 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/2] x86_64: expand kernel stack to 16K
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 5:05 PM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> So maybe test a patch something like the attached.
>
> NOTE! This is absolutely TOTALLY UNTESTED!
It's still untested, but I realized that the whole
"blk_flush_plug_list(plug, true);" thing is pointless, since
schedule() itself will do that for us.
So I think you can remove the
+ struct blk_plug *plug = current->plug;
+ if (plug)
+ blk_flush_plug_list(plug, true);
part from congestion_timeout().
Not that it should *hurt* to have it there, so I'm not bothering to
send a changed patch.
And again, no actual testing by me on any of this, just looking at the code.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists