linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH 0/3] HWPOISON: improve memory error handling for multithread process

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F32823225@ORSMSX114.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date:	Fri, 30 May 2014 17:25:39 +0000
From:	"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To:	Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, Kamil Iskra <iskra@....anl.gov>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
	Chen Gong <gong.chen@...ux.jf.intel.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 0/3] HWPOISON: improve memory error handling for
 multithread process

> This patchset is the summary of recent discussion about memory error handling
> on multithread application. Patch 1 and 2 is for action required errors, and
> patch 3 is for action optional errors.

Naoya,

You suggested early in the discussion (when there were just two patches) that
they deserved a "Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org".  I agreed, and still think the same
way.

-Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/