[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrX9s7xJRddB26ZiyjMEGbupbDj2qDHhio=80XSQ+staDA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 13:11:03 -0700
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Marian Marinov <mm@...com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Pondering per-process vsyscall disablement
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 1:05 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
> On 05/30/2014 01:00 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>
>> Do the flags go in the ELF loader or in the executable we're running?
>> Or both (and, if both, do we and them or or them)?
>>
>> I think the interpreter makes a little more sense in general: for the
>> most part, use of vsyscalls is a property of the runtime environment,
>> not of the program being run. But maybe this is naive.
>>
>
> They go into each object which becomes part of the running program, i.e.
> executable, dynamic libraries, and dynamic linker.
Well, sure, but the kernel is not about to start reading ELF headers
in dynamic libraries. So we need to make a decision based on the
interpreter and the executable. The conservative approach is to
require both to have the flag set *and* to offer a prctl to twiddle
the flags. Then userspace loaders can do whatever they want, and
distros get to rebuild the world :)
--Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists