[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1AE5EFA9-79A1-418A-8EF1-55764B8AA3BA@unimore.it>
Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 23:49:24 +0200
From: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@...more.it>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>,
Fabio Checconi <fchecconi@...il.com>,
Arianna Avanzini <avanzini.arianna@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC - TAKE TWO - 02/12] block, bfq: add full hierarchical scheduling and cgroups support
Il giorno 30/mag/2014, alle ore 17:39, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> ha scritto:
> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 11:37:18AM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 11:05:33AM +0200, Paolo Valente wrote:
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/cgroup_subsys.h b/include/linux/cgroup_subsys.h
>>> index 768fe44..cdd2528 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/cgroup_subsys.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/cgroup_subsys.h
>>> @@ -39,6 +39,10 @@ SUBSYS(net_cls)
>>> SUBSYS(blkio)
>>> #endif
>>>
>>> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CGROUP_BFQIO)
>>> +SUBSYS(bfqio)
>>> +#endif
>>
>> So, ummm, I don't think this is a good idea. Why aren't you plugging
>> into the blkcg infrastructure as cfq does? Why does it need to be a
>> separate controller?
>
> If there's something which doesn't work for bfq in blkcg, please let
> me know. I'd be happy to make it work.
>
This will probably be very useful for us.
Thanks a lot,
Paolo
> Thanks.
>
> --
> tejun
--
Paolo Valente
Algogroup
Dipartimento di Fisica, Informatica e Matematica
Via Campi, 213/B
41125 Modena - Italy
homepage: http://algogroup.unimore.it/people/paolo/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists