[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140531120526.GL15585@mwanda>
Date: Sat, 31 May 2014 15:05:27 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Yann Droneaud <ydroneaud@...eya.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, Emil Goode <emilgoode@...il.com>,
Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...escale.com>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] driver core/platform: remove unused implicit padding in
platform_object
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 10:01:39AM +0200, Yann Droneaud wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> Le vendredi 30 mai 2014 à 23:10 +0300, Dan Carpenter a écrit :
> > This changelog doesn't match the patch.
> >
>
> Hum, let me guess .... I've failed to set the proper subject prefix
> to add v6 suffic to PATCH:
> I've changed the patch title since v5 (from Emil Goode)... so it's like
> a new one.
>
> Is it really necessary to resend the patch ?
Oh. Sorry, I didn't understand what you were trying to say... You're
right.
For some reason I just looked at the patch first and then I started
reading the changelog and got to the bit about GCC on ARM and said
thought have been describing a different change without reading the
rest. This was my bad. I should have read more carefully.
Very thourough patch description. :)
regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists