linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 01/32] fs: introduce new 'struct inode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87wqd2f4cd.fsf@igel.home>
Date:	Sat, 31 May 2014 15:46:42 +0200
From:	Andreas Schwab <schwab@...ux-m68k.org>
To:	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	"linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux-Arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@...esourcery.com>,
	John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ley Foon Tan <lftan@...era.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 01/32] fs: introduce new 'struct inode_time'

Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> writes:

> "int" is signed, right? Or do you mean a bitfield needs an explicit "signed"
> keyword to be signed?

Yes, see 6.7.2#5.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, schwab@...ux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/