[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6394184.hHtXJE2Bp6@wuerfel>
Date: Sat, 31 May 2014 16:32:58 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
joseph@...esourcery.com, john.stultz@...aro.org, hch@...radead.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, geert@...ux-m68k.org, lftan@...era.com,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 13/32] ext3: convert to struct inode_time
On Saturday 31 May 2014 02:10:45 H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 05/30/2014 01:01 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > ext3fs uses unsigned 32-bit seconds for inode timestamps, which will work
> > for the next 92 years, but the VFS uses struct timespec for timestamps,
> > which is only good until 2038 on 32-bit CPUs.
> >
> > This gets us one small step closer to lifting the VFS limit by using
> > struct inode_time in ext3. The on-disk format limit is lifted in ext4,
> > which will work until 2514.
> >
>
> This may be what the spec says, but when I experimented with this just
> now it does seem that both ext2 and ext3 actually interpret timestamps
> as *signed* 32-bit seconds.
Right, I can see that in ext3_iget() now:
inode->i_atime.tv_sec = (signed)le32_to_cpu(raw_inode->i_atime);
I may have just looked at ext3_do_update_inode(), which uses this
unsigned conversion:
raw_inode->i_ctime = cpu_to_le32(inode->i_ctime.tv_sec);
and didn't realize that this is only half of the story, and since it
converts from (potentially 64-bit) long to u32, it doesn't matter
whether that is signed or unsigned.
I may have to go through all of them again to see if I made the same
mistake in other file systems as well.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists