linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 03/32] fs: introduce sys

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 31 May 2014 16:55:44 +0200
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	Andreas Schwab <schwab@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
	joseph@...esourcery.com, john.stultz@...aro.org, hch@...radead.org,
	tglx@...utronix.de, geert@...ux-m68k.org, lftan@...era.com,
	hpa@...or.com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 03/32] fs: introduce sys_utimens64at

On Saturday 31 May 2014 11:22:38 Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> writes:
> 
> > +asmlinkage long sys_utimens64at(int dfd, const char __user *filename,
> 
> All existing syscall names have the 64 suffix last, including the *at
> variants, so sys_utimensat64 would be more in line.

Ok, makes sense. I actually typed utimensat64 a few times myself and
couldn't really decide which one to use.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/