[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4756033.LkcFQN0chs@wuerfel>
Date: Sat, 31 May 2014 20:41:04 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@....com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] pci: Add IORESOURCE_BIT entry for PCIe ECAM resources.
On Saturday 31 May 2014 01:36:40 Liviu Dudau wrote:
> We would like to be able to describe PCIe ECAM resources as
> IORESOURCE_MEM blocks while distinguish them from standard
> memory resources. Add an IORESOURCE_BIT entry for this case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@....com>
I still don't see any value in this at all. What is the advantage
of doing this opposed to just having a standardized 'reg' property
for a particular compatible string?
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists