linux-kernel - Re: [patch 6/6] rtmutex: Avoid pointless requeueing in the deadlock detection chain walk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140530222138.1db0d706@gandalf.local.home>
Date:	Fri, 30 May 2014 22:21:38 -0400
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:	Jason Low <jason.low2@...com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 6/6] rtmutex: Avoid pointless requeueing in the deadlock
 detection chain walk

On Wed, 28 May 2014 11:43:16 +0200 (CEST)
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:

[snip]

> > 
> > In the above case, could we go 1 step further and avoid taking the pi
> > lock as well?

[snip]

> 
> Indeed.
> 
>  

Are you going to repost this patch? I'd like to review that one instead
of this one if you're going to make such a charge.


Thanks,

-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/