[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201405311201.FEG92893.FQSJOFFVOLOtHM@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Date: Sat, 31 May 2014 12:01:33 +0900
From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
To: konrad.wilk@...cle.com
Cc: dchinner@...hat.com, airlied@...ux.ie, glommer@...nvz.org,
mgorman@...e.de, linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/5] gpu/drm/ttm: Fix possible stack overflow by recursive shrinker calls.
>>From d960cdf1e1c91172b86ab9517e576e5fb7e71785 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Date: Sat, 31 May 2014 10:05:02 +0900
Subject: [PATCH 4/5] gpu/drm/ttm: Fix possible stack overflow by recursive shrinker calls.
While ttm_dma_pool_shrink_scan() tries to take mutex before doing GFP_KERNEL
allocation, ttm_pool_shrink_scan() does not do it. This can result in stack
overflow if kmalloc() in ttm_page_pool_free() triggered recursion due to
memory pressure.
shrink_slab()
=> ttm_pool_shrink_scan()
=> ttm_page_pool_free()
=> kmalloc(GFP_KERNEL)
=> shrink_slab()
=> ttm_pool_shrink_scan()
=> ttm_page_pool_free()
=> kmalloc(GFP_KERNEL)
Change ttm_pool_shrink_scan() to do like ttm_dma_pool_shrink_scan() does.
Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Cc: stable <stable@...nel.org> [2.6.35+]
---
drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_page_alloc.c | 10 +++++++---
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_page_alloc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_page_alloc.c
index 863bef9..deba59b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_page_alloc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_page_alloc.c
@@ -391,14 +391,17 @@ out:
static unsigned long
ttm_pool_shrink_scan(struct shrinker *shrink, struct shrink_control *sc)
{
- static atomic_t start_pool = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
+ static DEFINE_MUTEX(lock);
+ static unsigned start_pool;
unsigned i;
- unsigned pool_offset = atomic_add_return(1, &start_pool);
+ unsigned pool_offset;
struct ttm_page_pool *pool;
int shrink_pages = sc->nr_to_scan;
unsigned long freed = 0;
- pool_offset = pool_offset % NUM_POOLS;
+ if (!mutex_trylock(&lock))
+ return SHRINK_STOP;
+ pool_offset = ++start_pool % NUM_POOLS;
/* select start pool in round robin fashion */
for (i = 0; i < NUM_POOLS; ++i) {
unsigned nr_free = shrink_pages;
@@ -408,6 +411,7 @@ ttm_pool_shrink_scan(struct shrinker *shrink, struct shrink_control *sc)
shrink_pages = ttm_page_pool_free(pool, nr_free);
freed += nr_free - shrink_pages;
}
+ mutex_unlock(&lock);
return freed;
}
--
1.7.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists