linux-kernel - Re: Linux 3.14.5

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <538B4AEC.7010108@linicks.net>
Date:	Sun, 01 Jun 2014 16:46:52 +0100
From:	Nick Warne <nick@...icks.net>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux 3.14.5

On 01/06/14 13:04, Nick Warne wrote:
> I am getting hundreds of the same build warnings on this release -
> usually I get none - typical warnings:
>
> include/linux/sched.h:1691: warning: ‘pid_alive’ declared inline after
> being called
> include/linux/sched.h:1691: warning: previous declaration of ‘pid_alive’
> was here
>
> Info:
>
> Machine AMD64
> gcc version 4.2.4
>
> Any more info required please CC me.

OK, revisiting this between decorating, changing line 1691 in 
include/linux/sched.h to reflect 'inline':

from:
static int pid_alive(const struct task_struct *p);

to:
static inline int pid_alive(const struct task_struct *p);

stops GCC yelling at me.

Nick
-- 
"A bug in the code is worth two in the documentation."
FSF Associate Member 5508
http://linicks.net/
http://pi.linicks.net/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/