lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon,  2 Jun 2014 17:47:20 +0800
From:	Jianyu Zhan <nasa4836@...il.com>
To:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mhocko@...e.cz, riel@...hat.com,
	hannes@...xchg.org, kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com,
	cldu@...vell.com, nasa4836@...il.com, handai.szj@...bao.com,
	paul.gortmaker@...driver.com, mpatlasov@...allels.com
Cc:	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] mm/page-writeback.c: remove outdated comment

There is an orphaned prehistoric comment , which used to be against
get_dirty_limits(), the dawn of global_dirtyable_memory().

Back then, the implementation of get_dirty_limits() is complicated and
full of magic numbers, so this comment is necessary. But we now
use the clear and neat global_dirtyable_memory(), which renders this
comment ambiguous and useless. Remove it.

Signed-off-by: Jianyu Zhan <nasa4836@...il.com>
---
 mm/page-writeback.c | 18 ------------------
 1 file changed, 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c
index a4317da..f2683ac 100644
--- a/mm/page-writeback.c
+++ b/mm/page-writeback.c
@@ -156,24 +156,6 @@ static unsigned long writeout_period_time = 0;
 #define VM_COMPLETIONS_PERIOD_LEN (3*HZ)
 
 /*
- * Work out the current dirty-memory clamping and background writeout
- * thresholds.
- *
- * The main aim here is to lower them aggressively if there is a lot of mapped
- * memory around.  To avoid stressing page reclaim with lots of unreclaimable
- * pages.  It is better to clamp down on writers than to start swapping, and
- * performing lots of scanning.
- *
- * We only allow 1/2 of the currently-unmapped memory to be dirtied.
- *
- * We don't permit the clamping level to fall below 5% - that is getting rather
- * excessive.
- *
- * We make sure that the background writeout level is below the adjusted
- * clamping level.
- */
-
-/*
  * In a memory zone, there is a certain amount of pages we consider
  * available for the page cache, which is essentially the number of
  * free and reclaimable pages, minus some zone reserves to protect
-- 
2.0.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ