[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <9390495C-885D-4C0E-9F4D-70687A1BE9C5@unimore.it>
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2014 11:58:31 +0200
From: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@...more.it>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>,
Fabio Checconi <fchecconi@...il.com>,
Arianna Avanzini <avanzini.arianna@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC - TAKE TWO - 08/12] block, bfq: preserve a low latency also with NCQ-capable drives
Il giorno 31/mag/2014, alle ore 15:48, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> ha scritto:
> On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 11:05:39AM +0200, Paolo Valente wrote:
>> This patch addresses this issue by not disabling device idling for
>
> This patch addresses this issue by allowing device idling for...
>
>> weight-raised queues, even if the device supports NCQ. This allows BFQ
>> to start serving a new queue, and therefore allows the drive to
>
> This disallows BFQ to start serving a new queue, and therefore the
> drive to prefetch new requests, until the idling timeout expires.
>
> Prefetch? Can you elaborate?
By prefetching I meant just queuing more than one request (by the drive). I hope that this clarifies things a little bit.
Paolo
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> tejun
--
Paolo Valente
Algogroup
Dipartimento di Fisica, Informatica e Matematica
Via Campi, 213/B
41125 Modena - Italy
homepage: http://algogroup.unimore.it/people/paolo/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists