[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFp+6iFbDfWconRZzMhSXFG_RbXF-rnYwraJK1P1tQSb6R+Dkw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2014 17:39:51 +0530
From: Vivek Gautam <gautam.vivek@...sung.com>
To: Julius Werner <jwerner@...omium.org>
Cc: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@...sung.com>,
Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>,
"linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
Arun Kumar <arunkk.samsung@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: dts: Enable USB 3503 hub on exynos5250-snow
Hi Julius,
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 4:07 AM, Julius Werner <jwerner@...omium.org> wrote:
> We originally tried using this driver on ChromiumOS and never got it
> to work reliably. IIRC the issue was that if the hub had already been
> initialized by firmware, the USB stack might enumerate it before the
> usb3503 driver is probed and then the later reset will silently
> disrupt that connection. (I think I tried to force the 3503 to probe
> earlier as well, and there was some other issue with that although I
> don't recall the details.)
Ok, there was already a patch posted by you for this[1], which had
quite a much discussion
on it.
Would you like to give some pointers based on that ?
One that Olof had suggested was to use gpio-reset driver which is yet
to make to mainline.
But i think with that too we need to take care of the timing for
resetting the hub before PHY
gets reset.
>
> This will not be an issue for the Snow and Peach_Pi(t) boards (since
> neither of them shipped with firmware that supports this hub), but it
> will be an issue for Spring and Skate. On ChromiumOS we decided to
> carry a local (and admittedly ugly) patch to pull that reset line from
> the USB PHY driver instead, since that's the only way I could get it
> to work in all cases (see http://crosreview.com/58963).
>
> This doesn't mean I'm against this patch per se, just wanted to point
> out the trade-offs.
Thanks for raising the concern, this needs to be addressed.
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/7/9/486
--
Best Regards
Vivek Gautam
Samsung R&D Institute, Bangalore
India
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists