[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAmzW4MiUmmqXFeiwVNPDmtOSf6U+9J_U4_ZAF4Qv9w=T4AMiA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2014 23:01:55 +0900
From: Joonsoo Kim <js1304@...il.com>
To: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...allels.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm 8/8] slab: reap dead memcg caches aggressively
2014-06-02 21:10 GMT+09:00 Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...allels.com>:
> On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 01:41:55PM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
>> According to my code reading, slabs_to_free() doesn't return number of
>> free slabs. This bug is introduced by 0fa8103b. I think that it is
>> better to fix it before applyting this patch. Otherwise, use n->free_objects
>> instead of slabs_tofree() to achieve your purpose correctly.
>
> Hmm, I don't think slab_tofree() computes the number of free slabs
> wrong. If we have N free objects, there may be
> DIV_ROUND_UP(N,objs_per_slab) empty slabs at max, and that's exactly
> what slab_tofree() does, no?
Oops... Sorry for wrong comment.
You are right. Please ignore my comment. :)
BTW, we don't need DIV_ROUND_UP. I think that just N / objs_per_slab is
sufficient to get number of empty slabs at max. Am I missing too?
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists