[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140602153941.GA11004@atomide.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2014 08:39:41 -0700
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
Cc: FanWu <fwu@...vell.com>,
"linus.walleij@...aro.org" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"swarren@...dia.com" <swarren@...dia.com>,
Chao Xie <cxie4@...vell.com>, Yilu Mao <ylmao@...vell.com>,
Ning Jiang <njiang1@...vell.com>,
Xiaofan Tian <tianxf@...vell.com>,
Fangsuo Wu <fswu@...vell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] pinctrl: add params in disable_setting for different
usage
* Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org> [140523 09:16]:
> On 05/22/2014 07:54 PM, FanWu wrote:
> > the pinctrl-single driver is still using ops->disable, if I remove the
> > "disable" in ops, there will be build error in the vendor's code base
> > who is using pinctrl-single driver.
>
> I thought Tony said it was fine to simply remove pinctrl-single's
> ops->disable code completeley.
AFAIK nobody is using it. At least we don't have any references to
pinctrl-single,function-off property in the .dts files.
So removing pcs_disable seems safe to do, the property we probably
want to parse and produce a warning in case somebody is using it
out of tree.
Regards,
Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists