[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <538CB68A.6030408@zytor.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 10:38:18 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Waiman Long <waiman.long@...com>, Jason Low <jason.low2@...com>
CC: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, jejb@...isc-linux.org,
deller@....de, John David Anglin <dave.anglin@...l.net>,
linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, chegu_vinod@...com, tglx@...utronix.de,
riel@...hat.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, davidlohr@...com,
andi@...stfloor.org, aswin@...com, scott.norton@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] introduce atomic_pointer to fix a race condition in
cancelable mcs spinlocks
On 06/02/2014 10:25 AM, Waiman Long wrote:
>
> Doing an xchg is a very expensive operation compared with ACCESS_ONCE. I
> will not suggest doing that to make it right for PA-RISC at the expense
> of performance in other architectures.
>
And of course, this gets into the toxic question: what are reasonable
minimum requirements for Linux? How far do we need to stretch to
support niche architectures which have very small (Linux) userbases?
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists