[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20140602.111543.1026699389707378851.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 11:15:43 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: Alexey.Brodkin@...opsys.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, hdegoede@...hat.com,
peppe.cavallaro@...com, wens@...e.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org,
Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] stmmac: add DMA initialization delay to device tree
From: Alexey Brodkin <Alexey.Brodkin@...opsys.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2014 18:53:55 +0400
> On some platforms existing 100 msecond delay is not enough for DMA block to
> recover after reset.
> For example MAC DMA waits for all PHY input clocks are present and depending
> on the board reset bit deassertion may take different amount of time.
>
> Having this parameter easily configurable allows each board to have its own
> value, while all exisiting boards will continue to use current default value of
> 100 msec.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Brodkin <abrodkin@...opsys.com>
Is there an upper bound for this you can just use?
It taking too long and timing out is an error condition, so just
using a limit value of "100" or something should be perfectly fine.
I don't think it's reasonable to put every conceivable nuance into
the DT nodes.
I'm not applying this patch, sorry.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists