linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] MAINTAINERS: Add "R:" designated-reviewers tag

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 2 Jun 2014 12:08:21 -0700
From:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	josh@...htriplett.org
Cc:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	mingo@...nel.org, laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
	niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
	rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
	dvhart@...ux.intel.com, fweisbec@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com,
	sbw@....edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] MAINTAINERS: Add "R:" designated-reviewers tag

On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 11:56:35AM -0700, josh@...htriplett.org wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 11:16:58AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 10:59:28AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2014-06-02 at 10:48 -0700, josh@...htriplett.org wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 10:22:58AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, 2014-06-02 at 10:00 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > > > > A ksummit-discuss email thread looked at the difficulty recruiting
> > > > > > and retaining reviewers.
> > > > > 
> > > > > []
> > > > > 
> > > > > > Paul Walmsley also noted the need for patch
> > > > > > submitters to know who the key reviewers are and suggested adding an
> > > > > > "R:" tag to the MAINTAINERS file to record this information on a
> > > > > > per-subsystem basis.
> > > > > 
> > > > > I'm not sure of the value of this.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Why not just mark the actual reviewers as maintainers?
> > > > 
> > > > As discussed in the kernel summit discussion, being a regular patch
> > > > reviewer isn't the same thing as being *the* maintainer.
> > > 
> > > I think it's not particularly important or valuable
> > > here to make that distinction.
> > > 
> > > What real difference does it make?
> > 
> > In the particular case of Josh, none, at least from my viewpoint.  He of
> > course might or might not want to take on additional maintainership
> > responsibility at this particular point in time, in which case, I would
> > be more than happy to have him as a designated maintainer.
> 
> For the record, I'd be happy to be listed as a co-maintainer for RCU. :)

I would be happy to put you down as maintainer and Steven down as
official reviewer.  ;-)

							Thanx, Paul

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/