[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20140602154302.595a54190afdffd4b50f22c2@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2014 15:43:02 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Kamil Iskra <iskra@....anl.gov>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Chen Gong <gong.chen@...ux.jf.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] HWPOISON: improve memory error handling for
multithread process
On Fri, 30 May 2014 14:24:52 -0400 Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com> wrote:
> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 05:25:39PM +0000, Luck, Tony wrote:
> > > This patchset is the summary of recent discussion about memory error handling
> > > on multithread application. Patch 1 and 2 is for action required errors, and
> > > patch 3 is for action optional errors.
> >
> > Naoya,
> >
> > You suggested early in the discussion (when there were just two patches) that
> > they deserved a "Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org". I agreed, and still think the same
> > way.
>
> Correct. AR error handling was added in v3.2-rc5, so adding
> "Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # v3.2+" is fine.
I'm not sure that "[PATCH 3/3] mm/memory-failure.c: support dedicated
thread to handle SIGBUS(BUS_MCEERR_AO)" is a -stable thing? That's a
feature addition more than a bugfix?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists