[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140602230457.GE11004@atomide.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2014 16:04:58 -0700
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] gpio: of: Allow -gpio suffix for property names
* Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> [140425 00:53]:
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 5:28 PM, Thierry Reding
> <thierry.reding@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > From: Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>
> >
> > Many bindings use the -gpio suffix in property names. Support this in
> > addition to the -gpios suffix when requesting GPIOs using the new
> > descriptor-based API.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>
>
> It appears this can save quite a lot of code in drivers, work that
> I trust Thierry to persue based on this to some extent so patch is
> tentatively applied unless something comes up.
Looks like this patch causes a regression where GPIOs on I2C will
no longer return -EPROBE_DEFER but seem to return -ENOENT instead.
This breaks drivers using things like devm_gpiod_get_index()
on a GPIO that's on a I2C bus not probed yet.
Reverting commit dd34c37aa3e (gpio: of: Allow -gpio suffix for
property names) fixes things.
Regards,
Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists