linux-kernel - Re: [patch] mm, memcg: periodically schedule when emptying page list

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.11.1406021637170.5627@eggly.anvils>
Date:	Mon, 2 Jun 2014 16:44:34 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
To:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] mm, memcg: periodically schedule when emptying page
 list

On Mon, 2 Jun 2014, David Rientjes wrote:

> mem_cgroup_force_empty_list() can iterate a large number of pages on an lru and 
> mem_cgroup_move_parent() doesn't return an errno unless certain criteria, none 
> of which indicate that the iteration may be taking too long, is met.
> 
> We have encountered the following stack trace many times indicating
> "need_resched set for > 51000020 ns (51 ticks) without schedule", for example:
> 
> 	scheduler_tick()
> 	<timer irq>
> 	mem_cgroup_move_account+0x4d/0x1d5
> 	mem_cgroup_move_parent+0x8d/0x109
> 	mem_cgroup_reparent_charges+0x149/0x2ba
> 	mem_cgroup_css_offline+0xeb/0x11b
> 	cgroup_offline_fn+0x68/0x16b
> 	process_one_work+0x129/0x350
> 
> If this iteration is taking too long, indicated by need_resched(), then 
> periodically schedule and continue from where we last left off.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
> ---
>  mm/memcontrol.c | 10 ++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -4764,6 +4764,7 @@ static void mem_cgroup_force_empty_list(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
>  	do {
>  		struct page_cgroup *pc;
>  		struct page *page;
> +		int ret;
>  
>  		spin_lock_irqsave(&zone->lru_lock, flags);
>  		if (list_empty(list)) {
> @@ -4781,8 +4782,13 @@ static void mem_cgroup_force_empty_list(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
>  
>  		pc = lookup_page_cgroup(page);
>  
> -		if (mem_cgroup_move_parent(page, pc, memcg)) {
> -			/* found lock contention or "pc" is obsolete. */
> +		ret = mem_cgroup_move_parent(page, pc, memcg);
> +		if (ret || need_resched()) {
> +			/*
> +			 * Couldn't grab the page reference, isolate the page,
> +			 * there was a pc mismatch, or we simply need to
> +			 * schedule because this is taking too long.
> +			 */
>  			busy = page;
>  			cond_resched();
>  		} else

Why not just move that cond_resched() down below the if/else?
No need to test need_resched() separately, and this page is not busy.

Hugh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/