[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <538C240F.60501@lge.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 16:13:19 +0900
From: Gioh Kim <gioh.kim@....com>
To: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Laura Abbott <lauraa@...eaurora.org>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Heesub Shin <heesub.shin@...sung.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
이건호 <gunho.lee@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] CMA: aggressively allocate the pages on cma reserved
memory when not used
I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong.
These are my code.
770 #ifdef CONFIG_CMA
771 void adjust_managed_cma_page_count(struct zone *zone, long count)
772 {
773 unsigned long flags;
774 long total, cma, movable;
775
776 spin_lock_irqsave(&zone->lock, flags);
777
778 zone->managed_cma_pages += count;
779
780 total = zone->managed_pages;
781 cma = zone->managed_cma_pages;
782 movable = total - cma - high_wmark_pages(zone);
783
784 printk("count=%ld total=%ld cma=%ld movable=%ld\n",
785 count, total, cma, movable);
786
2014-06-02 오후 3:23, Joonsoo Kim 쓴 글:
> On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 02:54:30PM +0900, Gioh Kim wrote:
>> I found 2 problems at my platform.
>>
>> 1st is occured when I set CMA size 528MB and total memory is 960MB.
>> I print some values in adjust_managed_cma_page_count(),
>> the total value becomes 105439 and cma value 131072.
>> Finally movable value becomes negative value.
>>
>> The total value 105439 means 411MB.
>> Is the zone->managed_pages value pages amount except the CMA?
>> I think zone->managed_pages value is including CMA size but it's value is strange.
>
> Hmm...
> zone->managed_pages includes nr of CMA pages.
> Is there any mistake about your printk?
>
>>
>> 2nd is a kernel panic at __netdev_alloc_skb().
>> I'm not sure it is caused by the CMA.
>> I'm checking it again and going to send you another report with detail call-stacks.
>
> Okay.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists