linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC 2/2] rcu: Add Josh Triplett as designated reviewer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140603000246.GC14801@cloud>
Date:	Mon, 2 Jun 2014 17:02:46 -0700
From:	josh@...htriplett.org
To:	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Cc:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org,
	laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
	mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
	peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com,
	edumazet@...gle.com, dvhart@...ux.intel.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
	oleg@...hat.com, sbw@....edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/2] rcu: Add Josh Triplett as designated reviewer

On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 01:38:56PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 06/02/2014 01:36 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Mon, 2014-06-02 at 13:35 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >> On Mon,  2 Jun 2014 10:00:20 -0700 "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> >>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> >>> @@ -7321,6 +7321,7 @@ F:	kernel/rcu/torture.c
> >>>  
> >>>  RCUTORTURE TEST FRAMEWORK
> >>>  M:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >>> +R:	Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
> >>>  L:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> >>>  S:	Supported
> >>>  T:	git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulmck/linux-rcu.git
> >>
> >> I like the general principle - knowing who to poke regarding a kernel
> >> change is useful.
> >>
> >> I don't care much whether it's "M:" or "R:", although "R:" carries more
> >> meaning and hence is probably better.
> >>
> >> But why not "Cc:"?  That's meaningful too and is more copy-n-paste friendly.
> 
> Josh, what are you assuming that Andrew and I did not?

Not sure what you mean here.  Responding to the text you quoted: I have
no particular need to bikeshed the tag name, so if you prefer "Cc" and
can convince get_maintainer.pl to handle it, fine by me.

- Josh Triplett
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/