linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1] of/irq: do irq resolution in platform_get_irq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 03 Jun 2014 10:20:50 +0100
From:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>
To:	Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>,
	Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
Cc:	Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
	Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...com>,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] of/irq: do irq resolution in
 platform_get_irq_byname()

On Mon, 02 Jun 2014 07:48:59 -0700, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org> wrote:
> Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com> writes:
> 
> > Hi All,
> >
> > On 05/28/2014 12:03 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> 
> [...]
> 
> >> The bisected patch causes platform_get_irq() to always parse the
> >> devicetree to obtain the irq instead of using a precalculated value in
> >> the platform_device. There are two possible scenarios for this problem
> >> that I can think of:
> >> 1) Platform_get_irq() is getting called multiple times (which would
> >> happen on a deferred probe) but the setup code isn't handling it
> >> properly, like trying to request the GPIO more than once
> >> 2) the platform_device was preloaded with an irq number that differs
> >> from what is determined when parsing the tree. This would happen if a
> >> platform_device was created manually.
> >>
> >
> > Could anyone try attached patch? It has to improve situation, but it
> > might not fix all problems (see my previous e-mail).
> 
> I can confirm it makes the STE Snowball boot again on top of next-20150602.
> 
> > From 4a41912dba648c935982274966426fa430fd5aa4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
> > Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 12:53:34 +0300
> > Subject: [PATCH] mfd: ab8500: fix dt irq mapping
> >
> > The AD8500 defines itself as interrupt-controller in DT,
> > but it doesn't assign DT node to IRQ domain when creates it.
> > As result, of_irq_xx() helpers don't work because they can't
> > find necessary IRQ domain.
> >
> > Hence, fix it by assigning AD8500 core device DT node to IRQ
> > domain when it's created.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
> 
> Tested-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>

So is that it, or were there other problems? If it is then you can add
my acked-by when applying.

Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/