lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <538D1FC6.3090500@infradead.org>
Date:	Mon, 02 Jun 2014 18:07:18 -0700
From:	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To:	josh@...htriplett.org
CC:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org,
	laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
	mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
	peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com,
	edumazet@...gle.com, dvhart@...ux.intel.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
	oleg@...hat.com, sbw@....edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/2] rcu: Add Josh Triplett as designated reviewer

On 06/02/2014 05:02 PM, josh@...htriplett.org wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 01:38:56PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> On 06/02/2014 01:36 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2014-06-02 at 13:35 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>>>> On Mon,  2 Jun 2014 10:00:20 -0700 "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> --- a/MAINTAINERS
>>>>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
>>>>> @@ -7321,6 +7321,7 @@ F:	kernel/rcu/torture.c
>>>>>  
>>>>>  RCUTORTURE TEST FRAMEWORK
>>>>>  M:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>>>> +R:	Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
>>>>>  L:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
>>>>>  S:	Supported
>>>>>  T:	git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulmck/linux-rcu.git
>>>>
>>>> I like the general principle - knowing who to poke regarding a kernel
>>>> change is useful.
>>>>
>>>> I don't care much whether it's "M:" or "R:", although "R:" carries more
>>>> meaning and hence is probably better.
>>>>
>>>> But why not "Cc:"?  That's meaningful too and is more copy-n-paste friendly.
>>
>> Josh, what are you assuming that Andrew and I did not?
> 
> Not sure what you mean here.  Responding to the text you quoted: I have
> no particular need to bikeshed the tag name, so if you prefer "Cc" and
> can convince get_maintainer.pl to handle it, fine by me.

Sorry, what I meant is that Andrew and I both mentioned copy-paste and
you replied earlier (and I have already deleted it) that copy-paste shouldn't
be necessary for someone who is using get_maintainer.pl.

Do you redirect its output to your patch file and then edit it or does
get_maintainer.pl work with git-send-email or something else?  if something
else, what is it, please?

thanks,
-- 
~Randy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ